
Let's bring Asia back in focus and assess the themes in play, though I would recommend reading Part 1 before moving on:

There are virtues of belonging to the emerging world, yes there are! Repeated lessons on supply-shock induced inflation and having championed the domestic supply chain management in the past has positioned EM Asia significantly better than any other regions.

Monetary policy tightening by Asian CBs has been a much smaller magnitude versus the Fed and given the current growth-inflation mix has been better timed and been more effective at achieving price stability, anchoring inflation expectations. Barring South Korea that was more than two quarters ahead of the fed to hike, all other CBs may want to sync their actions with the Fed especially if all that 2024 warrants is 25-50bps of adjustment cuts. A constructive inflation backdrop with no rush to cut rates yet makes for an ideal environment to receive Asian rates versus paying US rates, a persistent theme for 2024 so far. Assessing what markets are pricing in terms of easing across markets – those are relatively muted/stunted rate cutting cycles, suggest a pace and magnitude like that of the US.
Emerging Asia's policy tightening and what's the market pricing for cuts. China's policy making has gone the other way owing to its structural demand slowdown.
Source: Pandemonium, Bloomberg. Figures as on June 7th, 11 AM SGT. Upper bound of the fed funds rate; pricing of cuts across markets has been computed using the most liquid/benchmark forward starting front end swap rates, precisely why Indonesia's pricing is hard to gauge.

This has compressed interest rate differentials (difference between Asian currency yield vs USD yield) for most of this year. But in terms of timing that hasn't necessarily tied up with lower FX points (interest rate parity not met) owing to practical considerations like these that typically nudge points higher:
Narrowing interest rate differentials in a soft-landing backdrop are ideal for taking an FX-hedged exposure in Asian local fixed income. Lower FX points translate to lower hedging costs for cash only investors who fund their bonds positions, resulting in a higher FX-hedged pick-up on Asian bonds versus their home currency hurdle/risk free rates.

Subdued FX vols in addition imply an attractive vol-adjusted carry on these bonds or a higher Sharpe ratio. Charts below from Deutsche Bank's recent chart pack depict it well: a) realised vol of FX hedged EM local currency bonds are back to pre-covid levels b) FX hedged EM local currency offer the best vol-adjusted carry across the spectrum of bonds.
Source: Deutsche Bank, Bloomberg Finance. Yield/vol ratio for major bonds indices has been calculated by dividing the weighted average yield of the index by the realized six months rolling volatility of the same.

Broader policy synchronization has opened pockets of opportunities especially in the Asian region that has struggled to attract foreign inflows into their local bond markets since after covid. Asia's strong external flow position, superior growth-inflation dynamic versus their EM peers and the west has positioned them to run independent policy pivots if they desired. But choosing to follow the Fed and intervening in currency markets has suppressed FX vols alongside the outperformance of Asian Fixed Income. FX-hedged exposure to Asian bonds is the region's best long carry expression.