Interest Rates update
Risk ‘carry-ed’ away by Fed’s assurance
Written by: Varda Pandey
- Published on: May 21, 2024
- , 4:41 pm
A system in need of shock therapy, would likely chug along with retail therapy!
Risk Assets seem to have found a ‘sweet’ equilibrium in sync with a 3-3.5% headline inflation steadily adding to US households’ networth. A very eloquent chair Powell, calling a rate hike ‘unlikely’, kept up the narrative for rate cuts at some point in the future despite the eroding confidence in inflation trajectory sustainably heading towards 2%. Add to this an impressive first quarter of earnings for S&P 500 companies reinforcing easier financial conditions and vice versa, and you likely get strong tailwinds to GDP growth in the coming quarters alongside still robust consumer demand. A recent GS report estimates these growth tailwinds of about 30-40bps each for the next two quarters; street estimates ranging from 3-3.5% y-o-y growth in Q2 versus 1.6% in Q1.
As for inflation, adverse base effects ahead can only be offset by 10-15bps monthly increments in Core PCE to confidently converge to Fed’s 2% target towards the end of the year. Doesn’t take an expert forecaster to conclude that’s a tall order in the current backdrop. Before we conclude our macro framework (request you to read this piece as a continuation to the pre-FOMC piece) here are some noteworthy observations of the past couple of weeks:
Negative surprises on macro data are deceptive – US Fed has blessed markets with longer periods of easy financial conditions followed by short bouts of tightness, short enough to be followed by easier conditions again. Periods of strength in risk assets that boost consumer and business sentiment also drive forecasts for follow-on macro data higher. Actual prints are likely to be below forecasts in this case, which doesn’t necessarily imply weaker growth conditions. In fact as per the picture below the Economic Surprise index may soon head back into positive if financial conditions remain easy.
Chart 1 – Bloomberg US Financial Conditions (white line) leads the Citi Economic Surprise Index (orange line) by 6-7 weeks

Source: Bloomberg
Consumer balance sheets update – Bloomberg has had excellent coverage on some of the US macro nuances – chart below shows a steady trajectory for consumer spend on services, with goods prices deflation likely saving enough for demand for services (and its prices) to remain sticky longer than one can imagine. Weak April retail sales that exclude the crucial services component of spending (the index represents less than half of personal consumption basket) isn’t a great indicator of consumer health. And lastly, the popular notion of consumers having run down their pandemic-era excess savings should still be qualified with their excess cash to nominal GDP ratio at 60% being 3 percentage points higher than the pre-pandemic trend. That’s an excess of USD 850 bio in nominal terms.
Chart 2 – Households spending on services remains well intact

Source: Bloomberg
Corporate earnings update – NVIDIA is the last of the magnificent seven due to report results this week, but with 90% of S&P 500 companies having reported earnings we are at Q1 EPS growth of 7.3%, nearly double of what was forecasted. Broader anecdotal evidence on profitability suggests optimism citing that the worst of last year’s profit hurdles seem to be behind us. Excluding Mag 7, profitability growth of rest of the index is estimated to flip into positive (from current -1.4%) from Q2. Even a steady grind higher in yields and the first (adjustment) rate cut as far as Q4 of this year can likely be accommodated by corporate balance sheets and sustain improvement in forward profit margins.
Chart 3 – S&P earnings per share estimates

Credit Spreads per turn of leverage making fresh lows – Squeezing credit spreads shouldn’t be blamed for potential mispricing of risk when easier financial conditions have been ordered by the Fed and easy access to financing can now be validated by the expected improvements in margins. Quoting a bloomberg analysis here:
“The spread per turn of leverage for single-A borrowers was at a historical low at the end of the first quarter (and has fallen since). But it’s BBBs and BBs that really stand out. For BBB bonds, the spread per turn of leverage (SPL) was the lowest since 4Q, 2019. For BBs it’s the lowest in a decade. Single-B borrowers, on the other hand, don’t look particularly expensive.”
Chart 4 – Credit Spreads per turn of leverage

To clarify the jargon, SPL is typically computed as average (rating specific) spread divided by the median net Debt to EBITDA ratio (understood as leverage) for that rating cohort. Net leverage has been stable for ratings above junk, while for Junk ratings it’s been falling.
- Forget signaling a recession, yield curve inversion has contributed to easier financial conditions by adding to the free cash flows of tech companies (via 5% plus interest income earnings on money market instruments) enabling large dividend payments/share buybacks.
Long duration bets building up + vol selling continues – after the last CPI print that was cheered big for core being in-line’ with economist estimates for the first time this year, markets luckily found itself in a Goldilocks backdrop bracing for long carry trades:
- Asset Managers built long positions in Treasury futures for the 5th straight week as per CFTC (they still remain underweight), with Hedge funds taking the other side
- Short USD Asia (dollar surplus currencies like KRW, TWD and positive carry INR with potential tailwind from another large mandate for the current government),
- Turnaround in EM Bonds outflows with recent sizeable inflows to high yielders Turkey and South Africa, and some into India
- Cross Asset Vol and the bias to short optionality – below is a snapshot of 3m at the money implied vols across assets, barring the breakout moves in copper (and gold) rest of the spectrum has been heading lower. In absolute terms, implied vols for rates are the highest and given the Fed-induced support for carry, selling of rates volatility has continued. Intuitively speaking, premium income on selling vol is akin to carry income assuming no change/move lower in the underlying’s realized volatility. Recommendations on going long assets with embedded call and prepayment options (mortgage-backed securities) amid spikes in underlying’s vol remain popular.
Chart 5 – 3m ATM implied volatility across assets (normalized to a factor of 100)

Source: Bloomberg
Should we prepare for a shock? – if Fed’s 2% target is the central premise for keeping monetary policy restrictive then there’s ample evidence that we aren’t restrictive enough. But since that rhetoric goes against all Fedspeak (i.e. another hike officially ruled out) for now, any inflation-induced adjustment higher in yields is likely to happen in a breakout fashion. If the Fed doesn’t want to engineer a shock, easier financial conditions may bring us to position for one.
Payer spreads on USD SOFR swaps – with no talks of 5%+ back-end treasury yields in the current backdrop and a much slower Fed balance sheet run-off, one can position for a 5%+ yield outcome towards the end of the year. Larger than expected monthly inflation prints as we approach the last quarter, and a growing likelihood of a Trump presidency should be enough for a 50-70bps sell-off in bonds. A 6m expiry 4.30/4.80, 1×1 payer spread on 10y USD SOFR swap costs about 10bps running for a max gain of 50bps. That’s 4x leverage to position for events with more than even odds.
To conclude, current range on yields are aligned with 1 to 2.5 cuts by the end of the year. I have personally liked being short the long end rates as a core view but being mindful of stretched paid exposure of CTAs has also been important to crystalise gains and build over at better levels. More neutral/cleaner positioning can allow for some leverage on your expressions – for instance being short 5y5y instead of 10y. Steepeners on the swap curve (forward starting 2×10, 5×30) have been reinstated after Fed’s reassurance on current conditions being restrictive enough – but even with rate hikes being ruled out, the pattern of bear flattening and bull steepening would be hard to break.
Current range feels like 4.30-4.55 on 10y UST, with next litmus test coming from April personal spending data and Core PCE scheduled to release end of this month.
Unexplained wild short lived price swings on option expiries and underlying cash market don’t bode well for broader market development. (For those well versed with India’s options market and ODTE please jump to page 6 on Potential Risk loopholes)
India’s ever booming equity options market can easily be touted as the third obsession of the country in addition to Bollywood and Cricket. Indian exchanges have facilitated the highest options contracts volume in the world since 2019 with National Stock Exchange bearing the crown for the largest derivatives exchange by far in terms of futures and options contracts traded.
Chart 1 – India boasts of the largest option contract volumes in the world
Each passing year however the crown gets heavier and likely harder to manage as the burgeoning derivative volumes have dwarfed cash markets volumes to potentially create an ecosystem rife for manipulation in the guise of speculation. Before we get into the specifics of potential risk vulnerabilities, let’s understand the market structure:
- The daily average volumes of the equity options market surely need to be quantified to get a sense of the size of the giant. In the month of March 2024, little over 10.5 billion equity option contracts were traded on both exchanges with NSE accounting for ~81% of the share. For a like to like comparison with the cash market let’s consider the traded notional – monthly notional equity derivatives turnover for National Stock Exchange in March 2024 stood at INR 7218 trio or ~USD 87 trio! Note that this is the cumulative monthly notional computed as number of units of the underlying per contract multiplied by the value of the underlying, i.e. it accounts for the changing market value of the underlying.
Chart 2 – Trends in Average Daily Notional turnover in Equity options on exchanges (figures are in INR crore, 100 crore = 1 bio)

The chart above quotes average daily equity options notional traded on both the exchanges – for the 19 business days in March 2024, NSE recorded daily notional turnover of ~INR 380 trio or USD 4.58 trio while BSE recorded at ~INR 80 trio or USD 0.96 trio.
- Corresponding figures for the cash equity market are on a significantly smaller scale. NSE’s cumulative cash equity volumes in March stood at a miniscule INR 20.43 trio or USD 246 bio. Similarly, against BSE’s monthly equity option notional turnover of INR 1519 trio or USD 18.3 trio, its monthly cash turnover stood at INR 2.76 trio or USD 33.25 bio. That’s an options to cash volume ratio (summing up both exchanges) of 377x!
Chart 3 – Trends in Average Daily turnover in Equity Cash segment on exchanges (figures are in INR crore, 100 crore = 1 bio)
Here is a cross-country comparison of the derivatives (futures and options) to cash volumes ratio, apologies the chart is a bit dated (ending H2 2023) but the difference would be just as stark if not more as of today:
Chart 4 – Derivatives to Cash Volume ratio across countries
- Market participants’ share in the overall turnover on both exchanges is also noteworthy – domestic prop traders in formats like algo funds, hedge funds, high frequency traders et al. are the biggest presence in the options market closely followed by regular retail and high networth individuals – summing up to ~73% participation. While the prop community can be assumed to be savvy with the derivative product, the same can’t be assumed for retail and HNIs especially those with non-finance background.
Cash equities interestingly have the same percentage of prop + others participation but the definition of ‘others’ is much wider to include partnership firms, AIFs, PMS clients, non-bank finance companies etc. to represent a more market savvy/risk-aware pool of investors relative to the options market.
Table 1 – Market Participants’ share in equity derivatives across exchanges
| Category | NSE | BSE | ||
| FY21-22 | FY22-23 | FY21-22 | FY22-23 | |
| Proprietary Trades | 34.8% | 38.0% | 83.50% | 75.30% |
| FPIs | 18.8% | 16.6% | – | – |
| Corporate | 8.4% | 6.3% | 2.30% | 3.60% |
| MFs | 4.5% | 4.1% | – | – |
| Domestic Institutions | 0.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Others | 33.4% | 34.8% | 14.20% | 21.10% |
*others category comprises of retail and high networth individuals
Source: SEBI Annual report FY22-23
Table 2 – Market Participants’ share in cash equity across exchanges
| Category | NSE | BSE | ||
| FY21-22 | FY22-23 | FY21-22 | FY22-23 | |
| Proprietary Trades | 27.5% | 27.2% | 33.9% | 33.1% |
| Domestic Institutions* | 2.3% | 2.6% | 2.4% | 3.1% |
| FPIs | 12.3% | 15.1% | 11.1% | 15.4% |
| MFs | 6.2% | 8.0% | 2.4% | 2.3% |
| Corporates | 3.8% | 4.2% | 4.6% | 4.5% |
| Others** | 47.8% | 43.0% | 45.6% | 41.6% |
| Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
*Domestic Institutions (excluding Mutual Funds) include banks, Domestic financial institutions, Insurance companies and the New Pension Scheme
**Others include individual domestic investors, Partnership Finns/LLP, Trust Society, AIFs, Depository Receipts, PMS clients, Statutory Bodies, VCFs, NBFC etc.
Source: SEBI Annual Report FY2022-23
SEBI conducted a study on the individual traders’ profit and loss in the Equity F&O segment for financial years 2019 and 2022. The report is surely worth a read to understand the nature and degree of involvement of the average Indian retail across ages and cities in the equities derivatives product. For good order individual trader/investor includes HUF (Hindu undivided family) and Non-resident Indians and excludes prop traders, institutions, partnership firms etc. Here’s a quick summary:
Table 3 – PnL comparison FY19 vs FY22
| All Individual traders | Active Individual traders | Non-active Individual traders | Active trimmed individual traders | |||||
| FY19 | FY22 | FY19 | FY22 | FY19 | FY22 | FY19 | FY22 | |
| Total number of individual traders (sample size) | 706,757 | 4,524,841 | 617,652 | 3,976,419 | 89,105 | 548,422 | 555,886 | 3,578,777 |
| % of Total | 100% | 100% | 87% | 88% | 13% | 12% | 79% | 79% |
| % of Loss makers during the year | 85% | 89% | 87% | 90% | 76% | 83% | 91% | 94% |
| Average absolute loss in INR | -175,332 | -111,216 | -194,020 | -124,528 | -12,730 | -6,217 | – | – |
| % of Profit makers during the year | 15% | 11% | 13% | 10% | 24% | 17% | 9% | 6% |
| Average absolute profit in INR | 146,791 | 151,997 | 181,919 | 186,399 | 10,927 | 6,221 | – | – |
Source: SEBI, Pandemonium
- Total number of unique individual traders in this market segment stood at 4.52 mio in FY22, that’s a jump of over 500% versus FY19 at 710k. 88% of such individual traders were considered ‘active’ i.e. traded more than 5 times a year.
- 9 out of 10 of these traders incurred losses amounting to an average of INR 110k or USD 1476 in FY22, with active traders losing a higher average of INR 125k or USD 1678. That compares with India’s per capita income of USD 2300 in the same year!
- 98% of this individual trader pool traded in options while 11% traded in futures in FY22, which compares with 89% and 43% respectively in FY19.
- Contract specifications – Since NSE accounts for the lion’s share of options activity (99% of equity derivatives turnover in FY23), let’s consider the product suite below (product list isn’t exhaustive).
- Minimum notional for an option contract was increased from INR 200,000 in July 2015 to INR 500,000 with lot sizes on any trading day adjusted for the value of the underlying to contain notional exposure between INR 500,000 to 1000,000. The intent here was to weed out reckless risk-taking (as much as possible) but in hindsight of course it pales in comparison to the explosion in retail activity.
- In terms of active trading the first 4 option products account for most of the volume. Nearly 98% of NSE’s derivatives activity is in Index options with NIFTY 50, Bank NIFTY and Financial Services NIFTY accounting for 36.5%, 56.4% and 7.1% respectively of the total index activity as of FY22-23.
- During FY22-23 – Weekly expiries accounted for 76.3% of total index option turnover on NSE while near month (one-month expiry) accounted for 23.5%. And the percentages may be even more skewed towards weekly expiries as we speak.
- With over 45000 individual futures and options contracts spanning across indices and stocks, there’s an expiry on every day of the week (Sensex expiry on Friday). If you add BSE’s Bankex (expiry on Monday) to the list, there’s a significant overlap of Banking and financial services heavy indices expiring on first three days of the week. In other words, even without a formal introduction of ‘zero days to expiry’ (0DTE) options, there’s a buffet of such options to facilitate speculative play every day of the week.
Table 4 – NSE Equity Option Product suite and specifications
| S no. | Index Name | Min Notional* | Contract type and Trading cycle | Expiry |
| 1 | NIFTY 50 | 500,000 | 4 weekly expiry contracts, 3 consecutive monthly contracts, additionally 3 quarterly months of the March, June, September and December cycle and 8 contracts following semi-annual Jun and Dec cycles. At any point in time there would be option contracts with at least 5 year tenure available. | Monthly contracts last Thursday of expiry month, weekly contracts every Thursday of expiry week |
| 2 | Bank NIFTY | 500,000 | Weekly, Monthly and Quarterly. Monthly contracts have a 3 month trading cycle with every month’s expiry replaced with new strikes for both calls and puts for next 3 month trading cycle. Weekly options have weekly expiries excluding the expiry week of the monthly contract. Quarterly contracts have March, Jun, Sep and Dec cycle. | Last Wednesday of the expiry period |
| 3 | NIFTY Financial Services | 500,000 | Weekly and Monthly. 4 trading cycles for weekly contracts excluding the monthly expiry and 3 consecutive months trading cycle with near month, mid month and far month expiries. | Last Tuesday of the expiry period |
| 4 | NIFTY Midcap | 500,000 | Last Monday of the expiry period | |
| 5 | NIFTY PSE | 200,000 | Monthly contracts with 3 month trading cycle, and near month, mid-month and far month expiries. Every near month expiry replaced with new strike for both call and put for a duration of 3 months. | Last Thursday of the expiry period |
| 6 | NIFTY Infrastructure | 200,000 | Last Thursday of the expiry period | |
| 7 | NIFTY Next 50 | 500,000 | Last Friday of the expiry period | |
| 8 | Individial Securities | 500,000 | Last Thursday of the expiry period | |
| 9 | NIFTY Midcap 50 | 200,000 | Last Thursday of the expiry period |
*above mentioned figures are the minimum notional at the time of introduction. The permitted lot size for futures contracts & options contracts shall be the same for a given underlying or such lot size as may be stipulated by the Exchange from time to time. Further details for the table can be found here
Source: National Stock Exchange, Pandemonium
Refresher on Zero day to expiry (0DTE) options – these are options that expire within 24 hours or at the end of the current trading day, having decayed almost fully as they approach expiry and hence those without intrinsic value are very cheap to buy. But it’s important to remember that options closer to at the money and approaching expiry are also closer to their peak gamma i.e. option value is extremely sensitive to the slightest move in the underlying’s price. In case needed you can refer to option greeks in Pandemonium’s options and strategies section for a refresher. Sudden spikes or troughs in the cash price of the underlying can result in exponential gains for those who have built a long gamma exposure. Here is why traders would engage in these options:
- 0DTE permit very short-dated hedges to position for key market-moving events, allow for greater flexibility in managing higher frequency trading books
- Since these are same day expiry options having lost nearly all their time value, are cheap to buy/need minimal capital deployment. In other words, they offer much higher leverage to option holders for the same notional exposure on the underlying.
- Are very liquid i.e. in addition to being cheap, they get quoted in a tight bid-offer adding (for whatever it’s worth) to their cost effectiveness to speculate on a single day’s volatility of the underlying.
Recent onshore anecdotal evidence/research suggests largely speculative trading activity from retail in equity options with “average holding period of less than 30 mins”. Expiry day volumes across the more actively traded indices (Nifty 50, Bank Nifty, Fin Nifty, Sensex) are all well above 50% of the total week’s volume suggesting the craze for ODTE. Another way of validating this is to note that end of day open interest is a much smaller fraction, sometimes low single digit percentage of the day trading volume.
Potential Risk Loopholes
Now keeping this market construct as our backdrop, let’s think of scenarios that can potentially expose the risk vulnerabilities of certain segments of the market. Severely deficient cash market liquidity versus options liquidity can create incentives for disproportionately high pay-offs at the cost of temporary disorderly market moves.
- An intended block purchase of a certain index or stock in the cash market if preceded by the purchase of ODTE near ‘at the money’ calls on the index or stock can exponentially profit the option bet. This is because the block purchase in shallow cash markets may be enough to move the underlying’s price (even if marginally) higher and accelerate the long gamma-powered gains in the ODTE option. Sizeable exposure to the underlying amounting to multiples of the notional cash purchase can be had with minimal capital outlay, in other words higher leverage of ODTE.
- In the same manner an intended sale of a certain index or stock in the cash market if preceded by the purchase of ODTE near ‘at the money’ puts on the index or stock can exponentially profit the puts.
- Option writers bracing for a peaceful expiry end up losing big in both cases, still worse in an otherwise trigger-less local and global market backdrop.
- Wild swings in ODTE options and the underlying’s price in the cash market has become more than an occasional occurrence. As an example, the Bank Nifty expiry on April 30th (brought forward by a day since original expiry on May 1st was a holiday) was a case in point.
Below is a Bloomberg snapshot of the intra-day price action – closer to 2 pm IST in a span of less than two hours the Bank Nifty Index first jumps 1% in the first 30 mins and then tanks about 1.4% from that peak in the next hour or so – that’s a full range of nearly 1200 index points up and down on effectively no news.
Chart 5 – Expiry day NSE Bank Nifty Intra-day price action
Source: Bloomberg, Pandemonium
Intra-day price action in the corresponding ODTE European Calls and Puts (sourced from NSE’s end of day Bhav Copy for April 30th) with near at the money strikes also shows a similar pattern within a similar time window. For instance, the call option prices near ATM/slightly OTM strikes shot up from 500-2500% (depending on their moneyness) as against a 1% upmove in the underlying in a span of 30 mins. On the down-move thereafter with expiry still closer, the put option prices near ATM/slightly OTM strikes jumped ~1000-10,000% (depending on their moneyness) as against a 1.4% decline in the underlying, in less than 60 mins! At the cost of repeating myself – liquidity is highest for ATM and closer strikes and so is the option’s gamma to realise exponential gains. Alongside option sellers astounded by an exploding gamma-hedging bill for these strikes struggle to exit their positions at the eleventh hour crystalising huge losses.
Table 5 – Snapshot of NSE’s Bhav Copy as of April 30, 2024
| FinInstrmNm | TckrSymb | XpryDt | StrkPric | OptnTp | PrvsClsgPric | OpnPric | HghPric | LwPric | ClsPric | SttlmPric |
| OPTIDX | BANKNIFTY | 30-Apr-24 | 49400 | CE | 223.5 | 221 | 630.5 | 0.05 | 22.25 | 49396.75 |
| OPTIDX | BANKNIFTY | 30-Apr-24 | 49700 | CE | 82.5 | 85.05 | 356.2 | 0.1 | 3.65 | 49396.75 |
| OPTIDX | BANKNIFTY | 30-Apr-24 | 50000 | CE | 29.75 | 24 | 143.9 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 49396.75 |
| OPTIDX | BANKNIFTY | 30-Apr-24 | 49400 | PE | 145.25 | 128.6 | 169 | 1.2 | 6.75 | 49396.75 |
| OPTIDX | BANKNIFTY | 30-Apr-24 | 49700 | PE | 303.6 | 310.45 | 378 | 15.5 | 215.2 | 49396.75 |
| OPTIDX | BANKNIFTY | 30-Apr-24 | 50000 | PE | 552.65 | 500 | 646.4 | 75 | 522.6 | 49396.75 |
Source: NSE, Pandemonium
- Interestingly these kinds of incentives in theory are also open to offshore investors who can accumulate the ODTE leverage via buying call or put spreadse. buying an at the money strike and selling another deep out of the money strike for equal notionals but with adequate net delta coming from ATM strike. As per the exposure guidelines of SEBI, net exposure on this option spread calculated as the sum of the same positive and negative notionals would be zero, making no impact to their outstanding option positions.
The sheer enormity of the equity derivatives market would make it challenging to track for disorderly price action especially sometimes in the presence of several moving parts both locally and globally. But to sustain a healthy operation and vibrance of these markets it may be worth observing some of these price movements with a fine tooth comb. SEBI and the exchanges have so far been proactive and amazingly enterprising in the development of the derivatives product addressing potential risks as and when necessary. I’m sure there’s no reason for us to doubt that spirit going forward.
